@92YHQCV

J>J  Personlig svarNo because this would increase the risk of accidental shootings, therefore schools should hire trained professional security guards.

J>J  Personlig svarJa

J>J  Personlig svarNo, immigrants should choose whether they want to learn English OR Not, and for those that do, the government should provide them with free language learning courses, but Personally, we should embrace the diversity that immigrants add to our country.

J>J  Personlig svarSelvbestemt. Jeg mener også at prevensjonsmidler, seksualundervisning og flere sosiale tilbud vil hjelpe med å redusere antall aborter.

J>J  Personlig svarYes, this system guarantees healthcare for everyone and private companies should not be able to profit off of healthcare. This should be in form of tax and should not be that expensive.

J>J  Personlig svarJa, vårt system for mental helse trenger flere midler for å kunne øke kvaliteten på helsetjenestene

J>J  Personlig svarYes, but only for horrific crimes with undeniable evidence, because too many people are innocently convicted. Plus, I think that spending life in prison is a harsher sentence because the dead don't suffer unless their soul was sent to hell that is.

J>J  Personlig svarYes, and remove all existing tax loopholes for large corporations, and lower taxes for the poor.

J>J  Personlig svarYes, for most but not all drugs, and we should also retroactively reduce sentences for those already serving time

J>J  Personlig svarJa, men kun for dødelige smittsomme sykdommer

J>J  Personlig svarYes, and provide more free public transportation, but only if the spending goes towards environmentally friendly solutions

J>J  Personlig svarNo. However the sentence should depend on why the person was trafficking drugs in the first place.

J>J  Personlig svarJa, så lenge det er trygt for dem å vende tilbake til hjemlandet sitt

J>J  Personlig svarYes. However, it should only cover very basic and simple topics, but if they want to, then they can be allowed to take a test that tests more than just a basic level of understanding

J>J  Personlig svarJa, så lenge de består de samme bakgrunnssjekkene som heterofile par

J>J  Personlig svarJa, men NATO bør fokusere mer på strategier for anti-terrorisme

J>J  Personlig svarYes, but only for medical use, and A. immediately release anyone serving time solely for drug offenses, & B. legalize, tax, and regulate marijuana instead of criminalizing it.

J>J  Personlig svarNei, å forby immigranter basert på deres religion er grunnlovsstridig

J>J  Personlig svarNo, after all, we should not try to influence any other country’s elections or policy because it’s not only ended in disaster in the long run, but it would be considered a Crime against Democracy, aka Democracide. However, personally, we should, but only to A. address security threats, not monetary interests, B. protect the country from human rights violations by a tyrannical ruler, and C. influence public opinion, & not tamper with a fair voting process, just as long as our actions are not considered a Democracide aka Crimes against Democracy, then I’m for it.

J>J  Personlig svarNei, vi bør investere i renere alternativer som vindkraft, vannkraft, thorium og geotermisk energi

J>J  Personlig svarNo, this is a violation of free speech, but even though I don’t respect anyone who does but they should have the right to do so. Plus, it Personally believe that it has now become just a piece of cloth that doesn’t represent what it should anymore, because America is an Oligarchy and NOT a Democracy

J>J  Personlig svarNo, but they should be kept somewhere safe like a migrant-specific shelter with all basic necessities provided until they’re thoroughly screened and cleared

J>J  Personlig svarNei, private fanger vil ofre kvalitet på omsorg og rehabilitering for profitt

J>J  Personlig svarJa, og politikere i alle aldre bør kreves for å bestå en mental kompetanseprøve

J>J  Personlig svarNot the current administration and we should give equal support to Israel and Palestine.

J>J  Personlig svarYes, as long as they can pass the same physical tests as men because preventing women from serving in combat roles is discriminatory

J>J  Personlig svarYes, and voters should be required to pass a basic test demonstrating their understanding of politics in order to vote

J>J  Personlig svarYes, but only if there is no chance they will survive their illness, and after a psychological examination to show they fully understand this choice

J>J  Personlig svarYes, but only after living in the country for between 5 - 10 years, and even then, they will only be allowed to vote only in local elections, until they become full-fledged citizens of the United States

J>J  Personlig svarNo, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices, plus we should treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

J>J  Personlig svarJa, og forby alle engangsprodukter som ikke består av minst 75% biologisk nedbrytbart materiale

J>J  Personlig svarAt this point, I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech, but it should all depend on the circumstances. Yes, a person’s hate speech can be protected by the first amendment, just as long as it does not encourage people to commit acts of violence against others. Still, I (personally) believe that the freedom of speech laws should only protect you from criticizing the government.

J>J  Personlig svarNei, myndighetene skal ikke avgjøre hva som er falske eller ekte nyheter

J>J  Personlig svarNei, vi bør satse på mer fornybare energiressurser i stedet

J>J  Personlig svarYes, just as long as the person under the age of 18 years old fully understands the choice of this irreversible life decision

J>J  Personlig svarYes, we should respect all cultural traditions, but their identity must be privately verified by a female staff member, just in case.

J>J  Personlig svarIncrease, but only for countries with no human rights violations/countries that are legitimately trying to improve and modernize.

J>J  Personlig svarYes, every citizen deserves the right to vote, except for felons convicted of murder or violent crimes,but only after completing their sentences and parole/probation.

J>J  Personlig svarYes, unless they have committed a very serious crime OR an act of terrorism

J>J  Personlig svarJa, og staten bør gjøre mer for å kreve mangfold på arbeidsplassen

J>J  Personlig svarRedusere

J>J  Personlig svarNo, higher agencies should handle extreme situations with specialized training and equipment. However, if police departments are given strict training on how and when to use the equipment, and will only use military-grade equipment in response to extreme situations like the higher agencies with specialized training and equipment, then Yes.

J>J  Personlig svarJa

J>J  Personlig svarNo, instead we should A. reduce military spending, B. focus on ending tax evasion, and C. increase taxes on the wealthy

J>J  Personlig svarNo, because these types of donations just turn into bribes from corporations, but allow donations from unions and non-profits, since (I think) they don't have a record of bribing political parties

J>J  Personlig svarNei, tjeneste bør være et valg i stedet for en plikt.

J>J  Personlig svarJa, men bare dersom offentliggjøring av informasjonen ikke truer vår nasjonale sikkerhet

J>J  Personlig svarja, og gjør det til en lønn til å leve av

J>J  Personlig svarNo, they should be instead captured, (humanly) interrogated, given a fair trial, and imprisoned instead because assassinating suspected terrorists can pose a real Public Relations problem for us, whether they are guilty OR NOT.

J>J  Personlig svarIt Depends. If they have finished serving their sentence (for a minor crime (e.g., protesting)), then-Yes. However, if A. the crime was committed while in office & B. it was a felony, violent, financial, sexual, etc., crime, then-No. Still, we should disallow politicians that are OR get put under investigation for a crime, whether before OR while running for office.

J>J  Personlig svarNei, dette vil skade industrien vår som er avhengig av å importere billige ressurser for å kunne lage produktene sine

J>J  Personlig svarJa, men med streng ansvarlighet.

J>J  Personlig svarJa, men bare i forhold til beløpet andre land bidrar med

J>J  Personlig svarHjelp

J>J  Personlig svarJa, men ikke for kosmetikk

J>J  Personlig svarJa, stoffmisbruk bør behandles som et helseproblem, ikke som et kriminelt problem.

J>J  Personlig svarNei, men øk skattenivået og importtariffen drastisk for bedrifter som outsourcer

J>J  Personlig svarJa

J>J  Personlig svarJa, men bare hvis deres hormonnivåer er lik de i kjønnskategorien de konkurrerer om

J>J  Personlig svarJa, alle bør motta en inntekt som dekker grunnleggende behov som mat og husly

J>J  Personlig svarYes, but the funding for local police departments and social & community-based programs should be split equally. However, for police departments in higher crime rate communities, then the funding and training should increase.

J>J  Personlig svarJa, og lag flere sosiale programmer for å gi gratis mat, klær og medisiner

J>J  Personlig svarRaise for large multinational corporations but lower for small businesses while eliminating deductions and loop holes.

J>J  Personlig svarJa

J>J  Personlig svarNei

J>J  Personlig svarNei

J>J  Personlig svarJa

J>J  Personlig svarJa

J>J  Personlig svarJa

J>J  Personlig svarNo, and neither should corporations and business organizations because of the abuse of loopholes in order to evade taxes.

J>J  Personlig svarNo, but they should be given the option to remove the ad if the information in it is all false [and/or] misleading

J>J  Personlig svarReduser, bedrifter utnytter for øyeblikket dette programmet slik at de kan redusere lønninger

J>J  Personlig svarNo, because education should not be privatized, and we should focus on improving our public schools and increasing teacher wages instead

J>J  Personlig svarNei, kun hvis de har en kriminell bakgrunn knyttet til narkotikamisbruk

J>J  Personlig svarYes, but they must perform community service on a daily basis while under house arrest using an electronic bracelet.

J>J  Personlig svarFærre, og sørg for at godene går til dem som trenger det mest

J>J  Personlig svarYes, even though officials gain valuable experience and become more effective representatives over time, term limits will increase performance and prevent corruption

J>J  Personlig svarNo, because the level of unpredictability makes cryptocurrency simply untenable = flawed

J>J  Personlig svarJa, men bare hvis de bruker fornybare energikilder

J>J  Personlig svarJa

J>J  Personlig svarNei

J>J  Personlig svarJa, men bare hvis den virkelig er desentralisert og ikke kan manipuleres av noen person, gruppe eller regjeringsorgan

J>J  Personlig svarJa

J>J  Personlig svarYes, and adjust them yearly so that retired government workers can receive an income to cover the basic necessities including food and housing

J>J  Personlig svarNei, bruk pengene på å forbedre infrastrukturen og samfunnet for å tiltrekke seg selskaper

J>J  Personlig svarNei, regjeringen skal aldri eie aksjer i private selskaper