Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
医保 › 单一支付者医保
MoS>MoS Personal answerYes, but allow people to use private insurance |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
MoS>MoS Personal answer不 |
经济 › 税
MoS>MoS Personal answer降低所得税税率并且去掉所有大企业现存的税收漏洞 |
社会 › 死刑
MoS>MoS Personal answerNo, killing someone for any reason other than self-defense is wrong. No matter what they may or may not have done. Especially since a lot of people that have been killed by the state have been confirmed as wrongfully convicted. |
外交政策 › 军费支出
MoS>MoS Personal answer不应当,我对当前的支出感到满意 |
社会 › LGBT收养权
MoS>MoS Personal answer是,只要他们通过与异性夫妇同样的背景检查。 |
外交政策 › 外国援助
MoS>MoS Personal answer提高,但是只对于那些没有对人权进行干涉的国家 |
环境 › 塑料制品禁用
MoS>MoS Personal answer应该,要禁用可降解材料最低含量不到 75% 的所有一次性产品 |
罪行 › Private Prisons
MoS>MoS Personal answer不 |
社会 › 安乐死
MoS>MoS Personal answer是,但前提是他们已经没有任何战胜病魔的可能 |
经济 › 全民基本收入
MoS>MoS Personal answerYes, and it should replace most welfare services |
国家安全 › Foreign Assassination
MoS>MoS Personal answerYes, but only if there is undeniable evidence they are planning to attack our country |
社会 › Hate Speech
MoS>MoS Personal answer是的 |
经济 › 公司税
MoS>MoS Personal answer大型跨国企业有所增加而小企业低一些 |
环境 › 水力压裂法
MoS>MoS Personal answerYes, but not in populated areas |
社会 › Gender Transition
MoS>MoS Personal answer不 |
罪行 › Demilitarize the Police
MoS>MoS Personal answerNo, extreme situations should be handled by higher agencies with specialized training and equipment |
教育 › Charter Schools
MoS>MoS Personal answerYes, but not at the expense of funding public schools |
罪行 › Defunding the Police
MoS>MoS Personal answerNo, increase funding and training for police departments in higher crime rate communities |
Housing › Homeless Encampments
MoS>MoS Personal answer不 |
社会 › Transgender Athletes
MoS>MoS Personal answerNo, athletes should compete based on the biological sex that is listed on their birth certificate |
经济 › Tech Monopolies
MoS>MoS Personal answer是的 |
罪行 › 监狱过度拥挤
MoS>MoS Personal answer是,但应当使用电子手铐将他们软禁在家 |
经济 › 离岸银行业务
MoS>MoS Personal answer不,公司和商业机构也不应该 |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 11 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 最不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.