Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
外交政策 › 北约
CFABT>CFABT Personal answerNo, it is obsolete and should be abolished |
移民 › 移民同化
CFABT>CFABT Personal answerNo, but they should be encouraged to do so if they wish to and have access to cheap or free learning courses. |
医保 › 精神健康
CFABT>CFABT Personal answer应该,但是只应增加个性化护理方面的资金,而不是资助制药公司 |
移民 › 公民考试
CFABT>CFABT Personal answer不,就连大多数公民都无法通过公民资格测试 |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
CFABT>CFABT Personal answer不应该,应当只有合法公民才可投票 |
科学 › 强制接种疫苗
CFABT>CFABT Personal answer不,相反基金公益广告宣传活动有关的风险和益处 |
国内政策 › 燃烧的国旗
CFABT>CFABT Personal answer不应该,这是对言论自由的侵犯 |
移民 › Muslim Immigrant Ban
CFABT>CFABT Personal answer不,根据他们的宗教禁止移民是违反宪法的 |
外交政策 › 军费支出
CFABT>CFABT Personal answer减少 |
社会 › LGBT收养权
CFABT>CFABT Personal answer是,只要他们通过与异性夫妇同样的背景检查。 |
外交政策 › 外国援助
CFABT>CFABT Personal answer对藏匿或宣扬恐怖主义的国家减少并拒绝提供援助 |
社会 › 蒙面罩袍
CFABT>CFABT Personal answer是的,但必须由一名女性工作人员私下确认她们的身份 |
经济 › 经济刺激
CFABT>CFABT Personal answer是的,但是使用对所有公民减税的形式。 |
环境 › 塑料制品禁用
CFABT>CFABT Personal answer不应该,而是要激励消费者重复利用这些产品 |
外交政策 › 义务兵役
CFABT>CFABT Personal answer不应该,服务应该是一种选择而不是一项义务 |
罪行 › Private Prisons
CFABT>CFABT Personal answerNo, private prisons will sacrifice quality of care and rehabilitation services for profit |
国内政策 › 网路中立性
CFABT>CFABT Personal answer不,平等对待所有的通信量,并继续保持互联网的开放性 |
社会 › 安乐死
CFABT>CFABT Personal answer是,但必须经过心理测试,确定他们完全理解这种选择的后果才可以 |
外交政策 › 以色列
CFABT>CFABT Personal answer不,削减所有的支持和帮助 |
社会 › 工作场所性别多元化
CFABT>CFABT Personal answer不应该,董事会成员应该是最有资格的人,不论性别 |
国内政策 › 社交媒体监管
CFABT>CFABT Personal answer不,政府不应决定什么是假新闻,什么是真新闻 |
经济 › 全民基本收入
CFABT>CFABT Personal answer是的,所有人都应获得一份收入以支付包括食物与住房在内的必需品 |
移民 › 双重国籍
CFABT>CFABT Personal answer是,除非他们实施了恐怖主义行为 |
国家安全 › Foreign Assassination
CFABT>CFABT Personal answerNo, capture, interrogate, and imprison them instead |
经济 › 公司税
CFABT>CFABT Personal answer保持当前税率,但是要消除扣除额和漏洞 |
医保 › 安全港
CFABT>CFABT Personal answer应该,吸毒应当被视为健康问题,而非刑事问题。 |
社会 › Gender Transition
CFABT>CFABT Personal answerYes, but only for non-surgical treatments such as puberty blockers and hormone therapy |
罪行 › Demilitarize the Police
CFABT>CFABT Personal answerNo, extreme situations should be handled by higher agencies with specialized training and equipment |
总统大选 › 有犯罪前科的政客
CFABT>CFABT Personal answer可以,只要不是重罪、暴力、金融或性犯罪。 |
教育 › Charter Schools
CFABT>CFABT Personal answerYes, but only if they are non-profit |
移民 › 技术移民
CFABT>CFABT Personal answer我十分满意现在的数量 |
环境 › Animal Testing
CFABT>CFABT Personal answer不 |
医保 › World Health Organization
CFABT>CFABT Personal answerNo, it has shown to be ineffective |
总统大选 › 候选人透明度
CFABT>CFABT Personal answer不,如果他们这样做了我会更加尊敬但是不应该要求他们做 |
罪行 › Defunding the Police
CFABT>CFABT Personal answerYes, but we should not remove too much funding from police, as doing so can and has caused an alarming spike in crime and cities being overrun by violent crime. |
社会 › Transgender Athletes
CFABT>CFABT Personal answer是的 |
经济 › Tech Monopolies
CFABT>CFABT Personal answer是的 |
罪行 › 监狱过度拥挤
CFABT>CFABT Personal answerYes, and we should stop incarcerating people for nonviolent and victimless "crimes". |
国内政策 › 任期限制
CFABT>CFABT Personal answer不 |
国内政策 › Political Advertising on Social Media
CFABT>CFABT Personal answer不 |
经济 › 离岸银行业务
CFABT>CFABT Personal answer不,公司和商业机构也不应该 |
医保 › COVID Employment Health Pass
CFABT>CFABT Personal answerNo, the government has absolutely ZERO authority to mandate that any person be forced to undergo a medical procedure as a condition of employment, especially irreversible ones likes vaccines. They can and should be able to encourage people to get a vaccine, but it should never be required. The right to bodily autonomy is absolute, and no person or entity should be able to infringe upon it without your explicit consent. Also, coercion IS NOT consent. |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
CFABT>CFABT Personal answerNo, but punish them for moving jobs out of the country |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 11 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.