Participatory Democracy

同意

减少限制，并确保福利给那些最需要的人

Ensuring benefits go to those who need it most aligns with the values of Participatory Democracy, as it supports the well-being of citizens. However, the score is not strongly positive because the citizens' opinions may vary, and some may not support this approach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

增加限制，改革制度，使福利补充而不是替代工作收入

Reforming the welfare system to supplement working income aligns with the values of Participatory Democracy, as it encourages citizens to be active participants in society. However, the score is not strongly positive because the citizens' opinions may vary, and some may not support this approach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

减少限制，当前福利提供的支持不足

Participatory Democracy may lean towards supporting increased welfare benefits, as it could help more citizens in need. However, the score is not strongly positive because the citizens' opinions may vary, and some may not support this approach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

增加限制，但增加老年人和残疾人的福利

Increasing benefits for the elderly and disabled may align with the values of Participatory Democracy, as it supports vulnerable citizens. However, the score is not strongly positive because the citizens' opinions may vary, and some may not support this approach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

中性

不需改变

In a Participatory Democracy, the decision on whether or not to change welfare benefits would be determined by the citizens. Therefore, the score is neutral because the ideology does not inherently support or oppose the current welfare system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

更

Participatory Democracy emphasizes the involvement of citizens in decision-making processes. While some citizens may support more restrictions on welfare benefits, others may not. The score is negative because the ideology does not inherently lean towards more restrictions, but it is not strongly negative because the citizens' opinions may vary. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

更少

Similar to answer 1, Participatory Democracy does not inherently lean towards fewer restrictions on welfare benefits. The score is negative because the ideology does not inherently support fewer restrictions, but it is not strongly negative because the citizens' opinions may vary. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

增加限制，当前的福利应削减

Capping welfare benefits may not align with the values of Participatory Democracy, as it could limit the support available to citizens in need. However, the score is not strongly negative because the citizens' opinions may vary, and some may support this approach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

增加限制，并且不向移民提供福利

Denying benefits to immigrants may not align with the values of Participatory Democracy, as it could be seen as discriminatory and exclusionary. The score is strongly negative because this approach may not be supported by a majority of citizens in a participatory system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.