@7PTCG382yrs2Y
Yes, through increased spending on infrastructure and tax breaks for low income citizens
@7PTCG382yrs2Y
Yes, through increased spending on infrastructure, tax breaks for low income citizens, and assisting sectors most heavily hit by the recession
@8PNDVD72yrs2Y
No, give citizens tax breaks
@3SXNRFF2yrs2Y
Yes, but only depending on the circumstances. In a recessionary environment with high inflation, stimulus may only exacerbate the problem.
@92JXK3J2yrs2Y
Stimulus exacerbates the problem. The poor must be given tax breaks, whilst the rich must have to pay a little bit higher taxes. Let the market correct itself over time. The government, besides using taxes, should only encourage people to work and correct recessions. Otherwise, it should sit back, correct misinformation, and let economists and the people handle recessions.
@92JXK3J2yrs2Y
Yes, stimulus and tax breaks.
@93BLLJ22yrs2Y
Yes and include more restricted groups, like legal dependent adults
@92YHQCV2yrs2Y
Yes, but in the form of A. tax breaks for low-income citizens, B. tax breaks for all citizens, C. increased spending on infrastructure, and/or D. assisting sectors most heavily hit by the recession. Plus, the government should try to intervene to boost a recovery.
Deleted2yrs2Y
No, but when deadly like 1930s is exception.
@9334YP32yrs2Y
The government should drastically reduce all taxation and public spending during recessions.
@92XBN652yrs2Y
yes they should but only one time don't issue it a bunch of times
Deleted2yrs2Y
No, but when deadly like 1930s is exception
Deleted2yrs2Y
No, but when it is deadly like 1930s is exception
Deleted2yrs2Y
No, but when severe like 1930s is exception.(I am Korean so my English is not so good :) )
@5BMM5HX2yrs2Y
Yes, by directly helping the citizens directly not a trickle down.
Deleted2yrs2Y
No, but when severe like 1930s is exception
Deleted2yrs2Y
No, but when deadly severe like 1930s is exception.
Deleted2yrs2Y
No, but when deadly like 1930s is exeption
Deleted2yrs2Y
No, but we can consider it if The Great Depression of 1930s happens again
@7PTCG382yrs2Y
Yes, through increased spending on infrastructure, lowering interest rates on student loans, and extending unemployment benefits for a greater length of time
@7PTCG382yrs2Y
Yes, through the combination of increased spending on infrastructure, lowering interest rates on student loans, and extending the time period for receiving unemployment compensation benefits
@8CN7P7L2yrs2Y
No, there is not enough money to do so. If we print out more money inflation will go up and the American dollar will devalue.
@7PTCG382yrs2Y
Yes, with the combination of increased spending on infrastructure and quarterly economic stimulus checks for low and middle-income citizens, and an extended period of unemployment compensation benefits for those who qualify
@7PTCG382yrs2Y
Yes, with the combination of increased spending on infrastructure and quarterly economic stimulus checks for low and middle-income citizens, with an extended period of unemployment compensation benefits for those who qualify
@923Z93G2yrs2Y
Yes, and nationalise natural resources and heavy industry
@7PTCG382yrs2Y
Yes, but in the forms of increased spending on infrastructure and an extended period of individual unemployment compensation benefits
@5BMX4XT2yrs2Y
Yes but for 18 months only
@5BMX4XT2yrs2Y
Yes but never for more than a year and only for individuals needing the most assistance.
@ForWheelen2yrs2Y
Cut taxes across the board including corporate taxes.
@7PTCG382yrs2Y
Yes, but in the forms of increased spending on infrastructure and an extended period of unemployment benefits
@heatherdvdprincess2yrs2Y
Continue to provide welfare for those who need it, and only provide economic stimulus in ways that will ultimately not increase our national debt.
@7PTCG382yrs2Y
Yes, in the forms of tax breaks for low income citizens and increased spending on infrastructure
@3HS499C2yrs2Y
Yes but only for individuals of low income that make less than 40 thousand a year.
@7PTCG382yrs2Y
Yes, but in the forms of increased spending on infrastructure and an extended period of unemployment compensation benefits
@8ZCJJ3R2yrs2Y
No, and the government should drastically reduce spending.
@7PTCG382yrs2Y
Yes, in the forms of increased spending on infrastructure and tax breaks for low income citizens
@7PTCG382yrs2Y
Yes, in the forms of increased spending on infrastructure and an extended period of unemployment compensation for low and middle-income citizens
@7PTCG382yrs2Y
Yes, in the forms of increased spending on infrastructure and an extended period of unemployment compensation benefits for low and middle-income citizens
@7PTCG382yrs2Y
Yes, in the forms of increased spending on infrastructure, assisting sectors most heavily hit by the recession, and an extended period of unemployment compensation for all eligible citizens
@8XJYDR32yrs2Y
No, but the government should provide tax breaks for all citizens
@8YM3JNV2yrs2Y
@7PTCG382yrs2Y
Yes, in the forms of increased spending on infrastructure, assisting sectors most heavily hit by the recession, and an extended period of unemployment compensation benefits for citizens
@7PTCG382yrs2Y
Yes, in the forms of increased spending on infrastructure, assisting sectors most heavily hit by the recession, and extended unemployment compensation benefits for low and middle-income citizens
@8VC2Q882yrs2Y
Yes, but discourage people from living solely on benefits.
@7PTCG382yrs2Y
Yes, but in the forms of increased spending on infrastructure and unemployment benefits as well as lowering interest rates
@7PTCG382yrs2Y
Yes, in the forms of assisting sectors most heavily hit by the recession, economic stimulus checks for low-and-middle-income citizens, and an extended period of unemployment compensation
@7PTCG382yrs2Y
Yes, in the forms of assisting sectors most heavily hit by the recession, quarterly economic stimulus checks for low-and-middle-income citizens, and an extended period of unemployment compensation
@7PTCG382yrs2Y
Yes, in the forms of increased spending on infrastructure, quarterly stimulus checks for low-and-middle income citizens, and extended unemployment compensation benefits
Deleted2yrs2Y
Yes, but only by emphasizing tax breaks for all citizens and as a temporary measure to stabilize markets. Measures must be taken to ensure this only occurs during times of recession. However, the government should only focus on helping citizens mostly affected by the recession, not on those that caused it.
Deleted2yrs2Y
Yes, but only by emphasizing tax breaks for all citizens and as a temporary measure to stabilize markets. Measures must be taken to ensure this only occurs during times of recession. However, the government should instead focus on helping citizens mostly affected by the recession, not on those that caused it.