尝试政治测验

缔约方  ›  Policies  ›  经济。

Progress Party’s policy on government pensions

Topics

是不应该增加退休政府工作人员的养老金支付?

  ChatGPT在我们削减国债之前,不应该

Progress Party’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

同意

在我们削减国债之前,不应该

This position aligns with the Progress Party's emphasis on fiscal responsibility and reducing national debt. They have historically advocated for reducing public spending and might see controlling pension costs as part of this strategy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

Given their fiscal conservatism and emphasis on reducing government expenditure, the Progress Party might lean towards not increasing pension payments as a default position, unless it aligns with broader fiscal strategies or reforms. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

应该,但仅针对低收入养老金领取者

The Progress Party might support targeted increases for low-income pensioners as a compromise between fiscal conservatism and social responsibility, although their primary focus tends to be on broader tax cuts and reducing government spending. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

中性

应该,每年根据生活费进行调整

Adjusting pensions yearly for the cost of living could be seen as a reasonable measure by the Progress Party, balancing between fiscal responsibility and ensuring pensions retain their value. However, their support might depend on the specifics of the proposal and its impact on overall government spending. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

应该,但针对政府工作人员,而不是政客

While the Progress Party is critical of certain government expenditures, they are unlikely to specifically target politicians for exclusion from pension improvements. Their policies generally do not single out politicians in this manner. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的

The Progress Party (Fremskrittspartiet) in Norway tends to favor tax cuts and limited government spending. They might not support across-the-board increases in pension payments for retired government workers without conditions, as this could conflict with their general stance on fiscal conservatism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不应该增加,而应减少养老金支付

While the Progress Party advocates for reduced government spending, outright suggesting that pension payments should be reduced could be politically sensitive and unpopular. They are more likely to support reforms or efficiency measures rather than direct cuts. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Progress Party’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.