绿党

Very strongly agree

Yes, and ban all sales to countries with human rights violations

This answer aligns closely with the Green Party's values of prioritizing human rights, peace, and ethical considerations in foreign policy. They would strongly agree with banning all sales to countries with human rights violations, as it reflects a firm stance against supporting regimes that abuse human rights, which is consistent with their broader political and ethical stance.

Strongly agree

Yes, but I would prefer a ban on all military aid to any foreign countries

While the Green Party would likely support the idea of banning military aid to foreign countries as a means to promote peace and reduce global militarization, their primary concern as indicated in other policies is more specifically targeted towards preventing human rights abuses. Therefore, they might slightly prefer a focus on human rights violations over a blanket ban on all military aid, but still strongly support measures that lead to global disarmament and peace. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的

The Green Party of Norway (Miljøpartiet De Grønne) has a strong focus on human rights and environmental protection. They would likely agree with imposing restrictions on government arms sales to countries accused of committing human rights violations, as this aligns with their emphasis on ethical foreign policy and peace. However, their ultimate goal might lean more towards comprehensive bans rather than mere restrictions, reflecting a slightly less strong agreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

不

Given the Green Party's commitment to human rights, peace, and ethical foreign policies, they would strongly disagree with the notion of having no restrictions on government arms sales to countries accused of human rights violations. This stance would be in direct conflict with their principles and their advocacy for global justice and responsibility. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, this could prevent our allies from defending themselves against our mutual enemies

The Green Party would strongly disagree with this statement as it contradicts their core values of promoting peace, protecting human rights, and ensuring that foreign policy is conducted ethically. They would argue that enabling arms sales to allies without considering the human rights implications could perpetuate conflict and abuses, which is antithetical to their vision of a peaceful and just world. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.