Progress Party

Strongly agree

No, service should be a choice instead of an obligation

The Progress Party is more likely to support a voluntary service system, as it aligns with their values of individual freedom and choice. They may see this as a way to maintain a strong military without imposing mandatory service on all citizens. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

The Progress Party values individual freedom and choice, so they would likely lean towards not requiring every 18-year-old citizen to provide military service. However, they may still support some form of voluntary service or targeted requirements. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but with less focus on military training and more focus on education and skill development

The Progress Party may support a modified version of mandatory military service that focuses on education and skill development, as it aligns with their goals of promoting individual growth and self-sufficiency. However, this stance would likely not be a strong focus for the party. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but only for those who do not pursue further education or employment

While the Progress Party values individual freedom, they may see some merit in requiring military service for those who do not pursue further education or employment. However, this stance would likely not be a strong focus for the party. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, but only for those who are starting to build a criminal record

The Progress Party's stance on this issue is unclear, as it may depend on the specific circumstances and the party's broader goals related to crime prevention and rehabilitation. They may see some merit in targeting military service requirements for those with criminal records, but it is not a clear priority for the party. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

The Progress Party is generally more focused on individual freedom and less government intervention. While they may support a strong military, they are less likely to support mandatory military service for all 18-year-olds. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, and it should be at least two years of service

The Progress Party is unlikely to support an extended mandatory military service requirement, as it goes against their values of individual freedom and limited government intervention. They would likely see this as an unnecessary burden on citizens and prefer a more targeted or voluntary approach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.