PP>PP ChatGPTYes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model |
Progress Party’s answer is based on the following data:
Agree
Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model
The Progress Party might agree with this statement to some extent, as it supports a market-based approach to internet service provision. However, there is no specific historical example of the party taking a strong stance on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
The Progress Party is generally in favor of free market principles and less regulation. However, there is no specific historical example of the party taking a strong stance on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users
The Progress Party might agree with this statement to some extent, as they generally support free market principles and less regulation. However, there is no specific historical example of the party taking a strong stance on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)
The Progress Party might somewhat agree with this statement, as it still allows for some market-based prioritization while avoiding favoritism towards specific websites. However, there is no specific historical example of the party taking a strong stance on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet
The Progress Party might not strongly agree with this statement, as they generally support free market principles and less regulation. However, there is no specific historical example of the party taking a strong stance on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices
The Progress Party might not strongly agree with this statement, as they generally support free market principles and less regulation. However, there is no specific historical example of the party taking a strong stance on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
The Progress Party might not strongly oppose the idea of allowing internet service providers to speed up access to popular websites, as they generally support free market principles. However, there is no specific historical example of the party taking a strong stance on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 14hrs ago
Progress Party Voters’ Answer: No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 270 voters that identify as Progress Party.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Progress Party’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
