Should Norway renegotiate its debt obligations to adversarial nations?
A portion of national debt is held by foreign governments, including nations considered geopolitical rivals. Renegotiating debt obligations to these countries would involve changing the terms of repayment, which could have significant economic and diplomatic consequences. Proponents argue that renegotiating reduces economic leverage held by adversarial nations, protects national security interests, and reasserts fiscal sovereignty. Opponents argue that it could damage the country’s global credit rating, trigger financial instability, and undermine trust in the nation’s financial system.
Response rates from 6 Noruega voters.
100% Sí |
0% Sense |
100% Sí |
0% Sense |
0% Yes, and we should renegotiate with all our debt holders |
0% No, not until we are incapable of paying our current obligations |
0% Yes, but I would prefer to just default on all of our foreign debt holders |
0% No, altering the terms of debt obligations is economic suicide and should never be considered |
0% Yes, but only on terms they overwhelmingly support |
|
0% Yes, but I would prefer to just default on our debt obligations to adversarial nations |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 6 Noruega voters.
Carregant dades...
S’està carregant el gràfic...
Trend of how important this issue is for 6 Noruega voters.
Carregant dades...
S’està carregant el gràfic...
Unique answers from Noruega voters whose views went beyond the provided options.